26
PureVidz (VIDZ) Crypto Coin Explained - What It Is, History & Current Status
Crypto Token Health Checker
Is This Token a Ghost?
Use this tool to evaluate if a cryptocurrency might be a 'ghost token' like PureVidz. Based on the article's research, tokens with multiple red flags are often defunct or high-risk.
Token Health Assessment
0
When you stumble across a name like PureVidz (VIDZ) in a market‑cap list, the first question is usually “Is this still live?” The short answer: it isn’t. PureVidz (VIDZ) is a relic from the 2017‑2018 ICO frenzy that vanished years ago, leaving behind a handful of stale data points and a cautionary tale for anyone eyeing micro‑cap tokens.
What PureVidz Claims to Be
According to the sparse description on Blockspot.io, PureVidz is “a cryptocurrency running on its own blockchain.” No whitepaper, no GitHub repository, no technical specs. In the crypto world, a genuine blockchain launch is accompanied by an explorer, a client download, and at least a basic description of consensus (PoW, PoS, DPoS, etc.). None of those pieces exist for VIDZ, which suggests the claim was either never materialised or the project never left the planning stage.
Historical Timeline - From Launch to Dormancy
- 2017‑2018: PureVidz appears on data aggregators during the ICO boom.
- 2019‑10‑15: Last recorded trade on BC.Game exchange (according to LiveCoinWatch).
- 2020‑present: No on‑chain activity, no developer commits, zero community chatter.
The six‑year silence places VIDZ squarely in the “zombie cryptocurrency” category-a term coined in a 2022 Chainalysis report that describes tokens that never achieved functional deployment.
Market Metrics - Numbers That Tell a Story
Even the basic numbers are murky. Different aggregators show wildly different prices:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Current Price (USD) | $0.000082 (LiveCoinWatch) / $0.00003575 (Delta.app) / $0.0009827 (CoinMarketCap) |
| 24‑h Volume | $0 (CoinMarketCap) - effectively no liquidity |
| Circulating Supply | 125.279 million VIDZ (reported by multiple sources) |
| Market Cap (approx.) | ~$4,500 - calculated using the lowest price figure |
| All‑Time High | $0.323609 (LiveCoinWatch) - a 99.97% drop |
| Ranking | #39,221 (LiveCoinWatch) - far below the top 30,000 |
The discrepancy in price reflects a market that no longer trades VIDZ. When a token has zero daily volume, price feeds become stale, and different sites freeze at the last known value.
Why the Token Fell Silent
Several red flags point to a failed launch rather than an intentional sunset:
- No contract address on Ethereum or Binance Smart Chain - both major smart‑contract platforms. LiveCoinWatch lists the fields as “N/A”.
- Absence of a development team or founders. Even the most obscure projects leave a name or an email; PureVidz provides none.
- Zero mentions on reputable crypto news sites (CoinDesk, Cointelegraph, The Block). A legitimate token, even a failing one, gets at least a post‑mortem article.
- Social‑media vacuum - no Reddit threads, no Twitter/X feed, no Discord channel since 2019. Blockspot.io reports zero “X Feed” activity.
Combine these with a six‑year inactivity period, and you land in the high‑risk zone defined by the FATF’s 2022 cryptocurrency risk framework: assets with no verifiable activity for three+ years are classified as “high probability scam”.
How to Spot a “Ghost Token” - Lessons from VIDZ
If you’re scouting altcoins, keep these checkpoints in mind. They’re distilled from the VIDZ experience and from academic studies such as the 2023 University of Cambridge analysis that found a 99.7% failure rate for tokens dormant over three years.
- Contract Transparency: Verify the token address on a block explorer (Etherscan, BscScan). Missing addresses usually mean no real blockchain.
- Developer Activity: Look for GitHub commits, releases, or at least a public roadmap. Zero activity for >12 months is a major warning.
- Liquidity: Check 24‑h trading volume on multiple exchanges. Tokens with $0 volume cannot be bought or sold.
- Community Presence: Search Reddit, Discord, Twitter. A dead community often signals a dead project.
- Independent Audits: Legitimate projects publish audit reports. Absence may indicate hidden vulnerabilities or fraud.
Current Viability - Is There Anything Left?
Practically speaking, PureVidz offers nothing you can realistically use. No wallet supports it, no exchange lists it, and there is no documented utility (e.g., staking, payments, NFT platform). In a market where even the smallest functional tokens secure a few thousand dollars in daily volume, VIDZ sits at zero.
If you somehow hold a few VIDZ tokens acquired during the ICO, they are effectively worthless in liquid terms. The only possible path to value would be a surprise revival-an unlikely scenario given the lack of developers, community, and any legal entity backing the token. Historical patterns from the 2018 Messari report, which saw 92% of tokens launched that year become worthless within 18 months, reinforce the improbability.
Bottom Line for Investors
PureVidz (VIDZ) is best classified as a defunct or “ghost” token. It illustrates the perils of chasing ultra‑low‑cap projects without solid fundamentals. If you’re building a portfolio, steer clear of assets that lack:
- Verified contract addresses
- Active development and open‑source code
- Regular trading volume
- Community engagement
Instead, focus on tokens that meet at least three of those criteria. That simple filter can slash exposure to high‑risk, low‑utility coins like VIDZ.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of PureVidz (VIDZ)?
PureVidz claims to run on its own blockchain, but no technical documentation or use‑case has ever been published. In practice, it provides no utility.
Is PureVidz still traded on any exchange?
The last known trade was on BC.Game in October 2019. Today no major exchange lists VIDZ, and 24‑hour volume is $0.
Can I still buy or sell PureVidz?
Practically no. Without listed pairs or liquidity, any attempt to trade would require finding a private counter‑party, which is risky and uncommon.
Why do price sources show different numbers for VIDZ?
When a token has zero active trading, aggregators keep the last known price. Each platform cached a different snapshot, leading to the observed spread.
Is PureVidz considered a scam?
There is no public evidence of an exit fraud, but the lack of any blockchain, team, or activity places it in the high‑risk “ghost token” category used by the FATF and many researchers.
Alex Horville
October 26, 2025 AT 09:04PureVidz is a dead coin that never left the launch pad. American investors should steer clear.
Shruti rana Rana
October 26, 2025 AT 22:57Indeed, the saga of PureVidz reads like a cautionary novella in the annals of crypto folklore. Its inception was shrouded in grand promises, yet the promised blockchain never materialised. The absence of a contract address, whitepaper, or active community is a glaring void that erodes credibility. One might liken the token to a phantom apparition that haunts market‑cap lists, offering only spectral price data. 🚨📉
olufunmi ajibade
October 27, 2025 AT 12:50Fellow investors, take this as a practical case study: before allocating capital to any micro‑cap, verify the on‑chain contract, audit reports, and developer provenance. The lack of any of these pillars in PureVidz signals a high‑risk venture that likely belongs in the “zombie” category. Scrutinise the token’s explorer for activity; if none exists, consider it a red flag. Moreover, cross‑reference multiple aggregators to expose price inconsistencies. Aggressive due diligence is the only armor against such empty promises.
Manish Gupta
October 28, 2025 AT 02:44Spot on! Your checklist is spot‑on, and it saves many from loss :) Staying vigilant is key.
Cyndy Mcquiston
October 28, 2025 AT 16:37PureVidz is a relic, not a remedy.
Natasha Nelson
October 29, 2025 AT 06:30Hey folks, listen up! This token looks shiny on paper, but the reality is a barren wasteland, no liquidity, no community, no utility! Remember, if a coin shows $0 volume for years, it’s basically a dead horse you shouldn’t bet on! Keep your portfolio healthy, diversify, and dodge ghost tokens like PureVidz! 🚀
Sarah Hannay
October 29, 2025 AT 20:24While enthusiasm is appreciated, it is equally important to ground excitement in factual analysis. The data you highlighted underscores the absence of fundamental support for PureVidz. Consequently, investors are advisable to reallocate resources toward assets with demonstrable activity and transparent governance.
Prabhleen Bhatti
October 30, 2025 AT 10:17Colleagues, the PureVidz phenomenon exemplifies a systemic failure in tokenomics validation, where the ostensible utility layer is conspicuously absent, and the governance framework remains undefined. Such anomalies often arise from insufficient on‑chain provenance verification and a lack of immutable audit trails. In practice, the discordance between reported market cap and actual liquidity amplifies systemic risk. Prospective participants should therefore employ a multi‑factor due‑diligence matrix, encompassing contract audit status, developer outreach, and community engagement metrics, before committing capital. 🌐
Elizabeth Mitchell
October 31, 2025 AT 00:10I hear you both. It’s sad to see another project fade away without a trace. Hopefully the community learns from these missteps.
Chris Houser
October 31, 2025 AT 14:04Team, when you spot a token like PureVidz, start by checking the blockchain explorer for contract activity. If the address shows zero transactions over years, that’s a red flag. Also, look for GitHub repositories; no commits mean no development. Finally, verify if any exchange lists the token with real volume. These steps form a solid vetting routine.
William Burns
November 1, 2025 AT 03:57Allow me to elucidate that the prior guidance, while well‑intentioned, merely scratches the surface of rigorous financial scrutiny. A discerning investor must also assess the token’s cryptographic primitives, consensus mechanisms, and regulatory compliance, lest one be ensnared by superficial metrics.
Ashley Cecil
November 1, 2025 AT 17:50It is incumbent upon the cryptocurrency community to uphold standards of transparency and accountability. The proliferation of tokens such as PureVidz, which lack verifiable substance, undermines the credibility of the broader ecosystem. Ethical investment practices demand that we eschew instruments bereft of demonstrable utility.
John E Owren
November 2, 2025 AT 07:44Indeed, maintaining ethical standards safeguards both individual investors and the market at large. By adhering to thorough verification protocols, we collectively diminish the allure of empty promises.
Joseph Eckelkamp
November 2, 2025 AT 21:37Ah, PureVidz – the world’s most ambitious non‑existent blockchain. One can almost hear the echo of its never‑launched consensus algorithm reverberating through the void. If you enjoy watching price charts freeze at absurdly low values, this token is a masterpiece of inertia. It’s a shining example of what happens when hype outpaces engineering, and the engineers never show up. The lesson? If a token lives only on paper, its value is as real as a unicorn’s paycheck. 🙃
Jennifer Rosada
November 3, 2025 AT 11:30While your sardonic portrayal is entertaining, it nevertheless highlights a grave concern: the unchecked proliferation of such phantom projects erodes investor confidence. It is imperative that regulatory bodies and vigilant analysts collaborate to flag and delist tokens that exhibit no substantive activity.
Anastasia Alamanou
November 4, 2025 AT 01:24Friends, let’s view the PureVidz case as a learning opportunity for the crypto space. By dissecting its failure points – missing contract address, zero on‑chain activity, absence of a development roadmap – we can refine our evaluation frameworks. Embracing such analytical rigor will empower us to differentiate viable projects from speculative mirages.
John Dixon
November 4, 2025 AT 15:17Oh, absolutely – because nothing says “innovation” like a token that never materializes. The only thing more impressive than the hype is the sheer lack of any tangible deliverable. 🎭
Brody Dixon
November 5, 2025 AT 05:10I get the sentiment; it’s frustrating to see resources wasted on empty promises. Let’s channel that energy into supporting projects with real roadmaps.